The use of chemotherapy for the treatment of cancer began in the
1940’s with the use of nitrogen mustard. In the attempt to discover
what is effective in chemotherapy, many new drugs have been developed
and tried since then. Chemotherapy is used most often to describe drugs
that kill cancer cells directly, and these drugs are sometimes referred
to as “anti-cancer” drugs.
Today’s chemotherapy uses more than 100 drugs to treat cancer. There
are even more chemo drugs still under development and investigation.
Various chemotherapy drugs are available to treat breast cancer. Breast
cancer chemotherapy is made of powerful drugs that target and destroy
fast-growing breast cancer cells. The drugs may be used individually or
in a combination to increase the effectiveness of the treatment.
Breast cancer chemotherapy is frequently used along with other
treatments for breast cancer, such as surgery. Chemotherapy may also be
used as the primary treatment when surgery isn’t an option.
Chemotherapy can help you live longer and reduce your chances of
recurrence. It also carries the risk of side effects. Some of the side
effects are temporary and mild but others more serious, and sometimes
permanent. Your doctor can help you decide whether chemotherapy for
breast cancer is a good choice for you. Chemotherapy drugs are given
intravenously or orally for treating breast cancer. The drugs enter the
blood stream and travel to all parts of the body, thus reaching cancer
cells that may have spread beyond the breast.
Chemotherapy is given in cycles of treatment; and the entire
chemotherapy treatment generally lasts several months to one year,
depending on the type of drugs given. A period of recovery is granted
after the chemotherapy is finished.
Your doctor considers a number of factors to determine whether and what
kind of chemotherapy would be of benefit to you. The higher your risk
of recurrence or metastasis, the more likely chemotherapy will be of
benefit. In some cases, characteristics of the breast cancer itself may
suggest other more beneficial treatments. Discuss your own treatment
goals and preferences with your doctor.
Factors commonly considered include:
Tumor size and grade. The more advanced the tumor, the more likely
chemotherapy may be useful in destroying any stray cancer cells.
Lymph node status. If breast cancer cells were found in your lymph
nodes during or before surgery, this is an indication of a higher risk
of metastasis and thus an indication for chemotherapy.
Age. Some studies suggest that breast cancer which occurs at a young
age is more aggressive than is breast cancer that develops later in
life. Thus, doctors may opt for adjuvant chemotherapy when treating
younger women to decrease the chances of the cancer spreading to other
areas of the body.
Previous treatments. Whether you’ve had chemotherapy before may affect your current treatment regimen.
Chronic health conditions. Certain health problems, such as heart
disease or diabetes, may affect your choice of chemotherapy drugs.
Hormonal status. If your breast cancer is sensitive to the hormones
estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR), hormone therapy — with drugs such
as tamoxifen, fulvestrant (Faslodex) or aromatase inhibitors (Arimidex,
Femara, Aromasin) — may be a better option for post-surgical adjuvant
therapy or they may be considered in addition to chemotherapy.
HER2 status. If your breast cancer produces (expresses) too much of a
growth-promoting protein known as human growth factor receptor 2
(HER2), your doctor may recommend drugs that specifically target this
protein — trastuzumab (Herceptin), lapatinib (Tykerb) — in addition to
chemotherapy.
Most of the women who undergo routine mammogram screenings for
breast cancer will never actually derive any real benefit from the
radioactive procedure, but the majority of those who end up testing
positive for tumors as a result of mammography will undergo needless
treatments for malignancies that never would have led to any health
problems.
These unsettling findings from a review recently published in the journal, The Lancet, found that for every woman whose life is supposedly saved as a result of early detection, three others undergo invasive surgery, toxic chemotherapy, or immune-destroying radiation treatments for benign tumors that never would have resulted in fatality.
This shocking information represents one more setback for the practice of mammography, which is still touted by the mainstream medical system as the premier method by which women have the best chance of not dying from breast cancer. Not only are women not being told about the significant radaioactive risks associatied with getting mammograms, but they are also not being told that the procedure often detects noncancerous tumors.
According to the review of the study done in the U.K., 1,307 women avoid dying from breast cancer every single year in the U.K. as a result of being screened for breast cancer. But another 3,971 women every year also end up opting for unnecessary, expensive, and highly-toxic treatment procedures for benign tumors as a result of mammography, which causes many of them to suffer irreparable damage to their immune health.
According to a similar study released early this year from Norway, as many as 25 percent of the breast cancers detected by mammography would have never even caused any health problems during the women’s lifetimes. At the same time, mammography alsofails to detect as many as 10% of harmful breast turmors, indicating that it is a highly unreliable, and very toxic, breast cancer detection method that needs to be effectively phased out of mainstream use.
“Once you’ve decided to undergo mammography screening, you also have to deal with the consequences that you might be over-diagnosed,” says Dr. Metter Kalager, a breast surgeon at Telemark Hospital in Norway about the widespread problem of breast cancer over-diagnosis. “By then, I think, it’s too late. You have to get treated.”
The truth is that we’ve exaggerated the benefits of screening and we’ve ignored the harms. Mammography helps some people but it leads others to be treated unnecessarily.
These unsettling findings from a review recently published in the journal, The Lancet, found that for every woman whose life is supposedly saved as a result of early detection, three others undergo invasive surgery, toxic chemotherapy, or immune-destroying radiation treatments for benign tumors that never would have resulted in fatality.
This shocking information represents one more setback for the practice of mammography, which is still touted by the mainstream medical system as the premier method by which women have the best chance of not dying from breast cancer. Not only are women not being told about the significant radaioactive risks associatied with getting mammograms, but they are also not being told that the procedure often detects noncancerous tumors.
According to the review of the study done in the U.K., 1,307 women avoid dying from breast cancer every single year in the U.K. as a result of being screened for breast cancer. But another 3,971 women every year also end up opting for unnecessary, expensive, and highly-toxic treatment procedures for benign tumors as a result of mammography, which causes many of them to suffer irreparable damage to their immune health.
According to a similar study released early this year from Norway, as many as 25 percent of the breast cancers detected by mammography would have never even caused any health problems during the women’s lifetimes. At the same time, mammography alsofails to detect as many as 10% of harmful breast turmors, indicating that it is a highly unreliable, and very toxic, breast cancer detection method that needs to be effectively phased out of mainstream use.
“Once you’ve decided to undergo mammography screening, you also have to deal with the consequences that you might be over-diagnosed,” says Dr. Metter Kalager, a breast surgeon at Telemark Hospital in Norway about the widespread problem of breast cancer over-diagnosis. “By then, I think, it’s too late. You have to get treated.”
The truth is that we’ve exaggerated the benefits of screening and we’ve ignored the harms. Mammography helps some people but it leads others to be treated unnecessarily.
June 8, 2013
veral
years after treatment, regardless of whether they were treated with
chemotherapy plus radiation or radiation only. In fact, there are
indications that there may be common and treatment-specific ways that
cancer therapies negatively affect cancer survivors’ mental abilities.