Breast
cancer is a malignant cancerous growth that begins in the tissues of
the breast. Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women, but it can
also appear in men. Breast cancer affects one in eight women in the
U.S. Cancer occurs as a result of abnormal changes in the genes
responsible for regulating the growth of cells and keeping them
healthy. Normally, the cells in our bodies replace themselves through
an orderly process of cell growth: healthy new cells take over as old
ones die out. A changed cell gains the ability to keep dividing
without control or order, producing more cells just like it and forming a
tumor. Breast cancer is always caused by a genetic abnormality.
However, only 5-10% of cancers are due to an abnormality inherited from
your mother or father.
About
90% of breast cancers are due to genetic abnormalities that happen as a
result of the aging process. Breast cancer is a malignant tumor that
has developed from cells in the breast. Usually breast cancer either
begins in the cells of the lobules, which are the milk-producing glands,
or the ducts, the passages that drain milk from the lobules to the
nipple. In situ is a Latin phrase meaning in place, or in this
instance, it means the abnormal cells are contained in one place (not
spread into other tissue.) DCIS does not always progress to invasive
cancer, where the cells invade breast tissue outside the ducts. DCIS
accounts for 85-95% of breast cancers.
Most of the women who undergo routine mammogram screenings for
breast cancer will never actually derive any real benefit from the
radioactive procedure, but the majority of those who end up testing
positive for tumors as a result of mammography will undergo needless
treatments for malignancies that never would have led to any health
problems.
These unsettling findings from a review recently published in the journal, The Lancet, found that for every woman whose life is supposedly saved as a result of early detection, three others undergo invasive surgery, toxic chemotherapy, or immune-destroying radiation treatments for benign tumors that never would have resulted in fatality.
This shocking information represents one more setback for the practice of mammography, which is still touted by the mainstream medical system as the premier method by which women have the best chance of not dying from breast cancer. Not only are women not being told about the significant radaioactive risks associatied with getting mammograms, but they are also not being told that the procedure often detects noncancerous tumors.
According to the review of the study done in the U.K., 1,307 women avoid dying from breast cancer every single year in the U.K. as a result of being screened for breast cancer. But another 3,971 women every year also end up opting for unnecessary, expensive, and highly-toxic treatment procedures for benign tumors as a result of mammography, which causes many of them to suffer irreparable damage to their immune health.
According to a similar study released early this year from Norway, as many as 25 percent of the breast cancers detected by mammography would have never even caused any health problems during the women’s lifetimes. At the same time, mammography alsofails to detect as many as 10% of harmful breast turmors, indicating that it is a highly unreliable, and very toxic, breast cancer detection method that needs to be effectively phased out of mainstream use.
“Once you’ve decided to undergo mammography screening, you also have to deal with the consequences that you might be over-diagnosed,” says Dr. Metter Kalager, a breast surgeon at Telemark Hospital in Norway about the widespread problem of breast cancer over-diagnosis. “By then, I think, it’s too late. You have to get treated.”
The truth is that we’ve exaggerated the benefits of screening and we’ve ignored the harms. Mammography helps some people but it leads others to be treated unnecessarily.
These unsettling findings from a review recently published in the journal, The Lancet, found that for every woman whose life is supposedly saved as a result of early detection, three others undergo invasive surgery, toxic chemotherapy, or immune-destroying radiation treatments for benign tumors that never would have resulted in fatality.
This shocking information represents one more setback for the practice of mammography, which is still touted by the mainstream medical system as the premier method by which women have the best chance of not dying from breast cancer. Not only are women not being told about the significant radaioactive risks associatied with getting mammograms, but they are also not being told that the procedure often detects noncancerous tumors.
According to the review of the study done in the U.K., 1,307 women avoid dying from breast cancer every single year in the U.K. as a result of being screened for breast cancer. But another 3,971 women every year also end up opting for unnecessary, expensive, and highly-toxic treatment procedures for benign tumors as a result of mammography, which causes many of them to suffer irreparable damage to their immune health.
According to a similar study released early this year from Norway, as many as 25 percent of the breast cancers detected by mammography would have never even caused any health problems during the women’s lifetimes. At the same time, mammography alsofails to detect as many as 10% of harmful breast turmors, indicating that it is a highly unreliable, and very toxic, breast cancer detection method that needs to be effectively phased out of mainstream use.
“Once you’ve decided to undergo mammography screening, you also have to deal with the consequences that you might be over-diagnosed,” says Dr. Metter Kalager, a breast surgeon at Telemark Hospital in Norway about the widespread problem of breast cancer over-diagnosis. “By then, I think, it’s too late. You have to get treated.”
The truth is that we’ve exaggerated the benefits of screening and we’ve ignored the harms. Mammography helps some people but it leads others to be treated unnecessarily.
June 8, 2013